1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 123 Cal.App.3d
  5. 123 Cal.App.3d 146 (1981)
 

CITY OF SAN LEANDRO v. HIGHSMITH

Docket No. 49802.

123 Cal.App.3d 146 (1981)

176 Cal. Rptr. 412

CITY OF SAN LEANDRO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROSE M. HIGHSMITH et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

August 28, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Melvin C. Kerwin and Kerwin & Duff for Defendants and Appellants.

Steven R. Meyers, City Attorney, Michael R. Nave and Lynch & Nave for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

BARRY-DEAL, J.

The property owners appeal from an order denying their motion for litigation expenses pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1250.4101 following an interlocutory judgment of condemnation of their property on September 26, 1979.

Appellants contend that respondent was apprised of their demand of $550,000 as just compensation by their deposition and that the actual

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases