1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 86 N.J.
  5. 86 N.J. 179 (1981)
 

BARCON ASSOCIATES, INC. v. TRI-COUNTY ASPHALT CORP.

86 N.J. 179 (1981)

430 A.2d 214

BARCON ASSOCIATES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TRI-COUNTY ASPHALT CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 28, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. William Barba argued the cause for appellant (Shanley & Fisher, attorneys; Mr. Barba and Charles A. Reid, III, on the briefs).

Irwin I. Kimmelman argued the cause for respondent (Kimmelman, Wolff & Samson, attorneys; Mr. Kimmelman and Ronald E. Wiss, on the brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by PASHMAN, J.

In this case we are called upon to decide whether the existence of an undisclosed, substantial business relationship between a party-designated arbitrator in tri-partite arbitration and the party designating that arbitrator constitutes "evident partiality" under N.J.S.A. 2A:24-8(b) and is therefore grounds for vacating the arbitration award.

Both the trial court and the Appellate Division held that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases