The principal issue presented on this appeal is whether prostitutes are accomplices of their promoter within the meaning of CPL 60.22 (subd 2). We hold that they are, and that a defendant may not be convicted of promoting prostitution unless the prostitute's testimony is supported by corroborative evidence "tending to connect the defendant with the commission" of the crime (CPL 60.22, subd 1).
The jury found defendant guilty of three...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
