SHULMAN, Presiding Judge.
This appeal is from appellant's conviction of possession of more than one ounce of marijuana. We affirm.
1. Appellant's contention that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized in a search of his car must fail in light of evidence authorizing the lower court to determine that appellant freely gave his consent to search the car. "`[T]he trial court's decision on questions of fact and credibility at...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
