1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 68 Ohio
  5. 68 Ohio St. 2d 165 (1981)
 

STATE EX REL. TEECE v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 81-472.

68 Ohio St. 2d 165 (1981)

THE STATE, EX REL. TEECE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 23, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Ward, Kaps, Bainbridge, Maurer, Bloomfield & Melvin and Mr. Robert L. Bridges, for appellant.

Mr. William J. Brown, attorney general, and Ms. Nancy Miller, for appellee Industrial Commission.

Messrs. Schwartz, Einhart & Simerka and Mr. Gregory P. Szuter, for appellee Standard Screw Company.

Per Curiam.

A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, and the burden of showing a clear legal right to this writ as a remedy from a determination by the Industrial Commission of the extent of claimant's injury is upon relator. See, generally, State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141. "It is well established that mandamus will not lie where there is some evidence to support...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases