Per Curiam.
The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on March 29, 1961. In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct both the petitioner and respondent move to confirm in part and disaffirm in part the Referee's report.
The Referee sustained certain charges of misconduct, finding that the respondent and his law partners (1) conspired and agreed that in consideration for the sum of
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.