1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 68 Ohio
  5. 68 Ohio St. 2d 156 (1981)
 

MAYFIELD-DORSH, INC. v. CITY OF S. EUCLID

No. 80-1718.

68 Ohio St. 2d 156 (1981)

MAYFIELD-DORSH, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CITY OF SOUTH EUCLID ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 16, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Arter & Hadden, Mr. Richard E. Kleinman and Mr. Michael C. Zellers, for appellees.

Mr. Earl T. Longley, director of law, and Mr. Peter P. Lograsso, for appellants.

Per Curiam.

It is a fundamental principle of Ohio zoning law that appellees, the parties challenging the validity of a zoning classification, have, at all stages of this litigation, the burden of demonstrating the unconstitutionality or unreasonableness of the zoning code. Leslie v. Toledo (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 488, 489; Brown v. Cleveland

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases