1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 180 N.J.
  5. 180 N.J. Super. 27 (1981)
 

CALIFORNIA v. CRUMP

180 N.J. Super. 27 (1981)

433 A.2d 791

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANK CHRISTOPHER CRUMP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 7, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Levy & Robertson attorneys for appellant (Lewis H. Robertson on the brief).

John B. Mariano, Camden County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Howard E. Freed, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges BOTTER, KING and McELROY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, J.A.D.

This case presents the question whether a probationer has a right to a hearing in the "receiving state," New Jersey, where the "sending state," California, has revoked consent to out-of-state supervision and has claimed that a violation of probation has occurred. Our pertinent statute is titled "Compact Between States Relating to Persons Convicted of Crime on Probation or Parole." N.J.S.A. 2A:168-14

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases