ESPINOSA v. NORFOLK & WESTERN RY. CO.

No. 54186.

86 Ill.2d 111 (1981)

427 N.E.2d 111

JOSE A. ESPINOSA, Appellee, v. NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

Opinion filed September 30, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Kionka, of Columbia, and Pope & Driemeyer, of Belleville (Thomas W. Alvey, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

John T. Pierce, Jr., of Paul L. Pratt, P.C., of East Alton, for appellee.

Baker & McKenzie, of Chicago (Francis D. Morrissey and Paul B. O'Flaherty, Jr., of counsel), for amici curiae Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. et al.

Edward W. Cleary, of Scottsdale, Arizona, and Paul L. Pratt, of East Alton, for amici curiae Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees et al.

John J. Naughton, of Henslee, Monek & Henslee, of Chicago, for amicus curiae United Transportation Union.


Judgment affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE UNDERWOOD delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an action for damages under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. (1976)) in which the sole issue before us is whether the trial judge's denial of defendant's motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds constituted an abuse of discretion.

Plaintiff, Jose A. Espinosa, was employed by defendant, Norfolk and Western Railway...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases