GUYOT v. MULTNOMAH CTY.

No. A 7712-18554; CA 17531.

625 P.2d 1344 (1981)

51 Or.App. 373

Rene Albert GUYOT, Appellant, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Oregon; Paul E. Nizdil, Individually and in His Capacity As Multnomah County Public Guardian and Conservator; James A. Callas, Individually and in His Capacity As Former Multnomah County Public Guardian and Conservator; Lompoc Land Company, Inc., an Oregon Corporation; R.L. Witham; Betty Witham; and Donald H. Greene, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 30, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nick Albrecht, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

James G. Driscoll, Portland, argued the cause for respondents Multnomah County and Paul E. Nizdil. With him on the brief was Bullivant, Wright, Leedy, Johnson, Pendergrass & Hoffman, Portland.

Theodore S. Bloom, Portland, waived appearance for respondent James A. Callas.

S. Ward Greene, Portland, argued the cause for respondents Lompoc Land Company, Inc., R.L. Witham and Betty Witham. With him on the brief was McMenamin, Joseph, Herrell & Babener, Portland.

Thomas E. Cooney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Donald H. Greene. With him on the brief was Cooney & Van Hoomissen, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and THORNTON and BUTTLER, JJ.


THORNTON, Judge.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from summary judgments for the defendants in this action for abuse of process, conspiracy to defraud, and breach of fiduciary duty. We affirm.

In February, 1973, the defendant Callas, then public guardian of defendant Multnomah County, was appointed by the probate department of the circuit court as temporary guardian of plaintiff's estate. (We will use the term "conservator" of the estate, in keeping with current...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases