SWEENEY, J.
The question presented in the instant appeal is whether the federal constitution or state law requires the suppression of evidence obtained by the warrantless recording of a telephone conversation between a consenting police informant and a non-consenting defendant.
I.
Appellant seeks to avoid the rule expressed in the plurality opinion of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. White (1971),
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.