Per Curiam.
Appellant argues that prohibition will lie because the order transferring jurisdiction to the "adult division" is facially invalid and, thus, ineffective to vest jurisdiction in such court. The specific basis for appellant's argument is that the transfer order fails to state the reasons therefor. According to appellant, the Juvenile Court failed to comply with the requirements set forth in Kent v. United States (1966),
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
