WILHELM v. ASSOCIATED CONTAINER TRANSP. (AUSTRALIA) LTD.

No. 79-4498.

648 F.2d 1197 (1981)

Fredrick WILHELM, Jr., and Robert Hammermeister, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ASSOCIATED CONTAINER TRANSPORTATION (AUSTRALIA) LTD., and Taylor Machine Works, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided May 20, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Newton R. Brown, Wilmington, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Judith B. Hine, Theodore A. Le Gros, Seattle, Wash., on brief; David F. Hiscock, Keller, Rohrback, Waldo & Hiscock (on brief), James F. Whitehead, III, Le Gros, Buchanan, Paul & Madden, P. S., Seattle, Wash., argued, for defendants-appellees.

Before WRIGHT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District Judge.


TAYLOR, District Judge.

Longshoremen Wilhelm and Hammermeister appeal from the dismissal of their product liability claim against the vessel owner Associated Container Transportation (Australia), Ltd., (Associated), and from the denial of their motion for new trial. The district court concluded the product liability claim against Associated was proscribed by 33 U.S.C. § 905 and found that the jury verdict in favor of Associated and Taylor Machine Works was not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases