1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 629 P.2d
  5. 629 P.2d 1198 (1981)
 

CROW-SPIEKER #23 v. ROBINSON

No. 12364.

629 P.2d 1198 (1981)

CROW-SPIEKER #23, A Co-Partnership, Appellant, v. John E. ROBINSON and Robert L. Helms Construction and Development Co., a Nevada Corporation, and Robert L. and Pauline Helms, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

June 24, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stewart & Stewart, Ltd., Reno, for appellant.

Leslie B. Gray, Reno, for respondent John E. Robinson.

Petersen & Petersen, Reno, for respondent Helms.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Crow-Spieker #23 (hereinafter #23), filed suit against respondent seeking specific performance of an alleged right of first refusal extended to #23 by respondent Robinson. The lower court granted respondents' motion for summary judgment concluding that the parol evidence rule excluded the introduction of any evidence of consideration for the first right of refusal. Because we find that the parol evidence rule was improperly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases