UNITED STATES JAYCEES v. BLOOMFIELD

No. 79-1141.

434 A.2d 1379 (1981)

UNITED STATES JAYCEES, Appellant, v. Mary BLOOMFIELD, et al., Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided August 31, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl D. Hall, Jr., Tulsa, Okl., with whom Robert J. Corber, Cheryl A. Skigin, and Robert M. Rader, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Danielle deBenedictis Nutter, with whom Scott R. Schoenfeld, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees.

Before KELLY, KERN and HARRIS, Associate Judges.


KERN, Associate Judge:

This is another litigative skirmish in the continuing legal battle that has been waged before various courts and administrative agencies in other jurisdictions over the lawfulness of the proviso in the bylaws of the United States Jaycees (Jaycees) that only males between the ages of 18 and 35 may be members.1 See New York City Jaycees, Inc. v. United States Jaycees, Inc., 512 F.2d 856

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases