1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 661 F.2d
  5. 661 F.2d 1115 (1981)
 

HEHEMAN v. E. W. SCRIPPS CO.

Nos. 80-3017, 80-3024.

661 F.2d 1115 (1981)

Bernard J. HEHEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. The E. W. SCRIPPS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, and The Cincinnati Enquirer, A Corporation Organized Under The Law of Ohio, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided October 23, 1981.

As Amended November 10, 1981.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied January 7, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Lloyd, Jr., Barbara Bison Ford, Stanley M. Chesley, Michael Boylan, Kevin E. Erwin, James B. Helmer, Jr., Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants, cross-appellees.

James W. Hengelbrok, Davis, Hengelbrok & Sachs, Cincinnati, Ohio, John R. Ferguson, Janine H. Coward, Myron L. Dale, Washington, D. C., Jonathan E. Thackeray, Charles T. Price, Baker & Hostetler, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant-appellee, cross-appellants.

J. Mack Swigert, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Roger Weber, Roger D. Staton, McIntosh, McIntosh & Knabe, Paul R. Reiners, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Cincinnati Enquirer.

Ronald Rosenberg, George Driesen, Jeffrey Freund, Van Arkel, Kaiser, Gressman, Rosenberg & Driesen, Washington, D. C., for amicus curiae AFL-CIO.

Frank M. Northam, Hanson, O'Brien, Birney & Butler, Washington, D. C., for amicus curiae American Newspaper Publishers Association.

Before ENGEL and MERRITT, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 7, 1982.

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

In this case we are called upon to decide what effect should be given to an agreement in the newspaper industry guaranteeing lifetime job security for printers. The newspaper terminated the workers covered by the agreement following a partial reorganization and merger. We reverse the decision of the District Court which declined to give full effect to the job security agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases