UNITED STATES v. ESPINDOLA

No. 80-1739.

650 F.2d 1064 (1981)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Delano ESPINDOLA, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided July 13, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven K. Christensen, Hilo, Hawaii, for defendant-appellant.

Stephen D. Tom, Asst. U. S. Atty., Honolulu, Hawaii, argued for plaintiff-appellee; Melvin K. Soong, Asst. U. S. Atty., Honolulu, Hawaii, on brief.

Before KILKENNY, SNEED and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to overturn an order revoking his probation on the ground that inasmuch as his probationary period had expired, the district court had no jurisdiction to entertain a petition to revoke it. The government insists the period had not expired and that, as a consequence, the district court did not lack jurisdiction. We agree with the government and affirm the judgment.

The issue is whether under the facts of this case appellant's probation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases