1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 627 P.2d
  5. 627 P.2d 1035 (1981)
 

NOLAN v. SEA AIRMOTIVE, INC.

No. 5177.

627 P.2d 1035 (1981)

James NOLAN, Wayne D. Hubbard, Jade L. Harris, John Sager Beltram, Richard H. Ludka, and John W. Mick, on Behalf of Themselves and on Behalf of Other Employees of the Defendant Similarly Situated, Petitioners, v. SEA AIRMOTIVE, INC., Respondent.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

May 8, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles G. Evans, Smith & Gruening, Anchorage, for petitioners.

Richard L. Waller, Hagans, Brown & Gibbs, Anchorage, for respondent.

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ., and DIMOND, Senior Justice.

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether the Legislature can properly prescribe a different form of class action procedure than that set out in Rule 23, Alaska R.Civ.P.1 We conclude that Rule 23 controls over the procedure contained in AS 23.10.130(b).2

James Nolan began the proceedings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases