MATTER OF COMPENSATION OF ELLIOTT

WCB Nos. 79-08090, 79-04846; CA A21216.

636 P.2d 1020 (1981)

In the matter of the Compensation of Kenneth L. Elliott, Claimant. Clayton's Automotive and Farmers Insurance Group, Petitioners, v. STAYTON AUTO SUPPLY, Scott Wetzel Services, Inc., and Kenneth L. Elliott, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 1, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul D. Clayton, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Luvaas, Cobb, Richards & Fraser, P.C., Eugene.

Emil R. Berg, Portland, argued the cause for respondents Stayton Auto Supply and Scott Wetzel Services, Inc. On the brief were Darryll E. Klein and Lang, Klein, Wolf, Smith, Griffith & Hallmark, Portland.

Robert Muir, Albany, argued the cause for respondent Kenneth L. Elliott. With him on the brief was Emmons, Kyle, Kropp & Kryger, Albany.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and WARDEN and WARREN, JJ.


WARREN, Judge.

This case presents a factual question whether claimant's low back injury was an aggravation of a previous compensable injury or a new injury. The Workers' Compensation Board, affirming the referee, determined that it was a new injury. The responsible employer and insurer appeal, and we affirm.

In November, 1974, while working for Stayton Auto Supply (Stayton), claimant injured his low back lifting a wheel and tire. A lumbar laminectomy was performed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases