1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 517 F.Supp.
  5. 517 F.Supp. 1108 (1981)
 

FLYING TIGER LINE v. PINTO TRUCKING SERVICE

Civ. A. No. 80-2583.

517 F.Supp. 1108 (1981)

FLYING TIGER LINE, INC. v. PINTO TRUCKING SERVICE, INC.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

July 6, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James W. Patterson, Harper, George, Buchanan & Driver, Philadelphia, Pa., Peter R. Reilly, Thompson, Hine & Flory, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Miles A. Jellinek, Cozen, Begier & O'Connor, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

SUR PLEADINGS AND PROOF

LUONGO, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Flying Tiger Line, Inc. (FTL) brought this action to recover $37,722.12 pursuant to the Carmack Amendment. 49 U.S.C. § 11707. This sum represents the amount FTL was required to pay for the repair of a jet engine damaged in transit by defendant Pinto Trucking Service, Inc. (Pinto). Pinto concedes responsibility for the damage to the engine, but contends that it effectively limited its liability...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases