INS. CO. OF NORTH AMERICA v. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CORP.

Nos. 80-619 and 80-620.

67 Ohio St. 2d 91 (1981)

INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA ET AL. v. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CORPORATION OF AMERICA, APPELLEE; THE ANSUL COMPANY, APPELLANT. YOUNGSTOWN STEEL AND ALLOY CORPORATION ET AL. v. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CORPORATION OF AMERICA, APPELLEE; THE ANSUL COMPANY, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 8, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Calfee, Halter & Griswold, Mr. William Tousley Smith and Mr. Norman A. Rheuban, for appellee.

Messrs. Harrington, Huxley & Smith, Mr. Eldon S. Wright and Mr. Frederick S. Coombs, III, for appellant.


LOCHER, J.

This case presents three issues: (1) whether Ansul has effectively disclaimed all implied warranties with Automatic Sprinkler; (2) whether Ansul has effectively excluded all liability for consequential damages; and (3) whether Automatic Sprinkler must indemnify Ansul against all claims arising in this litigation. Resolving each of these issues requires an interpretation of paragraph 9.

We hold that Ansul has neither disclaimed its liability for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases