1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 637 P.2d
  5. 637 P.2d 938 (1981)
 

STATE v. HAZEEM

Nos. C79-09-33039, C79-09-33098 and C79-08-32938; CA17762.

637 P.2d 938 (1981)

55 Or.App. 273

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Frederick Edward HAZEEM, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 21, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard S. Mannis, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and THORNTON and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends the trial court erred in fixing the amount of restitution. We find no error. State v. Boswell, 52 Or.App. 535, 628 P.2d 763, rev. den. 291 Or. 419 (1981).

Defendant's second and third assignments of error were not asserted nor excepted to at trial. Therefore, we decline to consider those assignments. State v. Coria,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases