PER CURIAM.
On original submission of this case, this court held (assuming arguendo that Dr. Meyer was the employer's agent) that the statements made by Dr. Meyer were not fraudulent nor did they constitute an estoppel so as to toll the one year statute of limitations. The supreme court reversed and held that a non-fraudulent representation by the employer's representative which unintentionally misled an employee to delay the filing of a workmen's compensation claim...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
