1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 96 Wn.2d
  5. 96 Wn.2d 56 (1981)
 

IN RE WITT

Nos. C.D. 6454, 6628.

96 Wn.2d 56 (1981)

633 P.2d 880

In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceedings Against FRANK OLIVER WITT and JAMES S. WITT III, Attorneys at Law.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 17, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Caroline D. Davis and Robert T. Farrell, for Bar Association.

James J. Mason, for respondents.

BRACHTENBACH, C.J.

These attorney disciplinary proceedings involve Frank O. Witt and James S. Witt, brothers and law partners, practicing in Pierce County. In the matters here involved, respondent attorneys were acting jointly and in concert.

A 15-count complaint was filed against the Witts. After a 9-day hearing, the hearing panel officer (HPO) recommended a reprimand based upon 1 count. The remaining counts were dismissed. The Disciplinary Board, after reviewing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases