WOODCOCK v. LAND CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT

LCDC No. 79-045; CA 17571.

626 P.2d 901 (1981)

51 Or.App. 577

Lyle WOODCOCK, Petitioner, v. LAND CONSERVATION and DEVELOPMENT Commission, Jack C. Oldham, and Josephine County Board of Commissioners, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 13, 1981.

Reconsideration Denied May 21, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel F. Hughes, Grants Pass, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Mark J. Greenfield, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Jack C. Oldham.

Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Land Conservation and Development Commission. With him on the brief were James M. Brown, Atty. Gen., John R. McCulloch, Jr., Sol. Gen., and William F. Gary, Deputy Sol. Gen., Salem.

Duane Wm. Schultz, Grants Pass, waived appearance for respondent Josephine County Bd. of Com'rs.

Before JOSEPH, P.J., and WARDEN and WARREN, JJ.


JOSEPH, Presiding Justice.

This case requires reconciling two provisions of the state land use planning statutes. The first, ORS 197.251(1), authorizes the Land Conservation and Development Commission to grant or to deny acknowledgment that a local government's land use regulatory devices comply with the statewide planning goals; it necessarily contemplates that LCDC might review local land use matters for compliance with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases