ILLINOIS-INDIANA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, Defendant-Appellee, Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc.; Public Service Company of Indiana, Inc.; Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.; Northern Indiana Public Service Company; Indianapolis Power & Light Company; Indiana & Michigan Electric Company; Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Company; Princeton Telephone Company; United Telephone Company; General Telephone Company of Indiana; Indiana Telephone Association; Frank J. Biddinger, Public Counselor, Continental Telephone Company of Indiana, Respondents-Appellees, Indiana Municipal Electric Association, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee.
Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 27, 1981.
October 27, 1981.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Phillip E. Bainbridge, Highland, for plaintiff-appellant.
Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Jeff G. Fihn, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for Public Service Commission of Indiana.
Bruce N. Cracraft, Thomas E. Dooley, Indianapolis, for Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Inc.
Thomas W. Yoder, Livingston, Dildine, Haynie & Yoder, Fort Wayne, for Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.
Fred P. Bamberger, Bamberger, Foreman, Oswals & Hahn, Evansville, for Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Co.
Jerry P. Belknap, Indianapolis, Ronald Prater, Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., Fort Wayne, Marcus E. Woods, Christopher J. Weber, Indianapolis Power & Light Co., Indianapolis, Charles W. Campbell, Frank T. Lewis, Public Service Co. of Indiana, Inc., Plainfield, David C. Jensen, Eichhorn, Eichhorn & Link, Hammond, Barnes, Hickam, Pantzer & Boyd, Indianapolis, for Electric Utility respondents-appellees.
Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District.
NEAL, Presiding Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The Illinois-Indiana Cable Television Association, Inc. (CATV)1 appeals from a determination by the Public Service Commission of Indiana (Commission) that the Commission has jurisdiction over cable television pole attachment rates, charges, and conditions.2 (Hereinafter, in the interests of brevity and the avoidance of undue repetition, pole attachments...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
