PER CURIAM.
Appellant/Dr. Schreiber appeals from a directed verdict finding that there was no evidence from which a jury could conclude that he was engaged in the active practice of dentistry on the date he was injured. We affirm.
The relevant portion of the insurance policy provides that coverage will terminate on "the date the insured retires or ceases to be actively engaged in the duties of his profession or occupation." Appellant sold his dentistry
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.