SED, INC. v. CITY OF DAYTON

No. C-3-81-193.

519 F.Supp. 975 (1981)

SED, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF DAYTON, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

July 1, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. McCarty, Martin, McCarty, Richman & Wright, Fairborn, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

Thomas G. Petkewitz, City Atty., Dayton, Ohio, for defendant.


OPINION AND ENTRY SUPPLEMENTING DECISION OF JUNE 11, 1981, OVERRULING BRANCHES VI AND VII OF THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

RICE, District Judge.

In its Decision and Entry of June 11, 1981, 515 F.Supp. 737, which, inter alia, overruled six of the seven branches of the Defendant's motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs' amended complaint, the Court, in overruling Branches VI and VII of said motion, indicated that it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases