STATE v. HOLT

No. CR 79-0707; CA 15950; SC 27449.

630 P.2d 854 (1981)

291 Or. 343

STATE of Oregon, Petitioner, v. Jackson Cantwell HOLT, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided July 8, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Gary, Deputy Sol. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the petition were James M. Brown, Atty. Gen., and John R. McCulloch Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

John Henry Hingson, III, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Before DENECKE, C.J., and TONGUE, LENT, LINDE, PETERSON and TANZER, JJ.


TANZER, Justice.

Defendant appeals his conviction for public indecency, contending that it was error to deny his motion to suppress evidence of police observation of his conduct in a public restroom. The Court of Appeals agreed and reversed the conviction. We accepted to review the nature of reasonably expected privacy protected by the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases