Per Curiam.
Appellants contend that proof of the unsupervised presence of domestic animals, such as cattle, in a public highway results in the animals' owner or keeper being subject to strict liability in tort for damages resulting therefrom or, alternatively, constitutes negligence per se.
We reject appellants' contention that a strict liability theory is applicable to this cause. The syllabus of Nixon v. Harris (1968),
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.