NIKE, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
RUBBER MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, S. D. New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 27, 1981.
February 27, 1981.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Stoel, Rives, Boley, Fraser & Wyse, Portland, Or., Gregory R. Mowe, Portland, Or., of counsel; Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, for plaintiff Nike, Inc.
Jay Greenfield, Jonathan Sinnreich, Elizabeth S. Koltun, New York City, of counsel; Alexander & Green, New York City, for defendant Rubber Manufacturers Assn., Inc.
Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for defendant Bata Shoe Company, Inc.; William M. Dallas, Jr., New York City, of counsel.
Cahill, Gordon & Reindel, New York City, for defendant Charles A. Eaton Co.; Dean Ringel, New York City, of counsel.
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, New York City, for defendant Eltra Corp.; Shatzkin, Cooper & Rudoff, New York City, for defendant Hyde Athletic Industries, Inc.
Pennie & Edmonds, New York City, for defendant New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Arthur Dry & Kalish, New York City, for defendant Uniroyal, Inc.; Kirkwood, Kaplan, Russin & Vecchi, New York City, Kaplan, Russin & Vecchi, Washington, D. C., Julius Kaplan, Washington, D. C., Kathleen F. Patterson, of counsel.
Foley, Lardner, Hollabaugh & Jacobs, Washington, D. C., Douglas V. Rigler, Washington, D. C., of counsel for defendant and counterclaim plaintiff Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Co., Inc.
United States District Court, S. D. New York.
OPINION
BONSAL, District Judge.
Nike, Inc. ("Nike"), an Oregon corporation, instituted this action in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2, and the Wilson Tariff Act, 15 U.S.C. § 8, and tortious conduct constituting unfair competition. On August 14, 1980, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon transferred the action...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
