PENDER v. BUILDERS BOARD

CA 16635; SC 27589.

633 P.2d 780 (1981)

291 Or. 562

Leava PENDER, Dba Hermiston Home Builders, Petitioner, v. BUILDERS BOARD, Warren J. Hearle, Administrator, and E & E Specialties, Inc., Dba Erico Bldg. Supply, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided September 9, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter H. Wells, Pendleton, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Jan P. Londahl, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Builders Board. On the briefs were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., John R. McCulloch, Jr., Sol. Gen., William F. Gary, Deputy Sol. Gen., and Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

No appearance for E & E Specialties, Inc.


PER CURIAM.

In an original proceeding in the Court of Appeals, the petitioner, Leava Pender, dba Hermiston Home Builders, sought judicial review of the validity of a rule of the Builders Board, Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 812-11-020(2). The rule was "affirmed without opinion." 49 Or.App. 843, 622 P.2d 1159 (1980). Petitioner filed a petition for review with the Supreme Court in January 1981. OAR 812-11-020, however, was amended in November 1980. We were not informed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases