Louis L. HERM; Bertha M. Herm; Andrew A. Jutt; Benjamin F. Williams; and Virginia Russ, on behalf of themselves and all other persons other than the defendants who purchased on or after September 11, 1968 any securities issued or sold by Daniel Boone Fried Chicken, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Daniel W. STAFFORD; Glenn Reynolds; Phillip T. Stafford; John L. Rollins; R. M. Pennington; Morris Burns; Leonard Nave; European Fast Foods, Inc.; Robert T. Harrold; Great Southern, Inc.; Albert B. Chandler, Sr.; J. Daniel Chandler; Dale S. Coenen; Howard N. Johnson; Space Research Center, Inc.; Jerry Lytton; Colonial Securities, Inc.; Carling Dinkler, Jr.; Joseph L. Arnold; John W. Morgan; Albert B. Chandler, Jr.; Whitney Dunlap; R. Haywood Alves; Murray A. Morguelan; James R. Spence; Rogers Badgett, Jr.; and Sammy Davis, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued December 3, 1980.
Decided November 3, 1981.
Opinion on Denial of Rehearing January 21, 1982.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
J. Vernon Patrick, Jr. (argued), Lee H. Zell, Thomas J. Gallo, Berkowitz, Lefkovitz & Patrick, Birmingham, Ala., Spencer E. Harper, Jr., William W. Davis, Harper, Ferguson & Davis, Louisville, Ky., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Edward A. Marye, Jr. (argued), Clay, Williamson, Rabe, Marye & Cowden, Mount Sterling, Ky., for defendants-appellees Alves, Chandler, Jr., and Dunlap.
W. Stuart McCloy, Sr. and W. Stuart McCloy, Jr. (argued), McCloy, Dudley, Yawn & McCloy, Memphis, Tenn., Joseph R. Gathright, Jr., McCoy, Brockman & Gathright, Louisville, Ky., for defendant-appellee Rogers Badgett, Jr.
Donald H. Balleisen (argued), Richard A. Getty, Greenebaum, Doll & McDonald, Louisville, Ky., for defendant-appellee Carling Dinkler, Jr.
Before LIVELY, ENGEL and KEITH, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
ENGEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, a class of persons who purchased Daniel Boone Fried Chicken (DBFC) stock after September 11, 19681 or received such stock in a merger with Commonwealth Security Investors (CSI), appeal from summary judgment entered against them in this securities case.
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants based on the expiration of the statute of limitations. There are three basic...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.