PER CURIAM.
Appellant was found guilty of violating his probation in case no. 73-3638, possession of paraphernalia, case no. 74-2247, resisting arrest without violence, and case no. 74-2248, loitering.
At the time the appellant violated his probation in these three cases, the maximum time of probation had expired. Therefore, the lower court was in error in finding him guilty of violating probation in these three cases.
The appellant was also found...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.