EBERHARD MFG. CO. v. BALDWIN

Nos. 10838 and 10859.

628 P.2d 681 (1981)

EBERHARD MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Division of Eastern Company, a corporation, Appellant, v. Daniel Craig BALDWIN, a minor child, and Robert Baldwin and Sharon Baldwin, Guardians ad litem for Daniel Craig Baldwin, Respondents. Daniel Craig BALDWIN, a minor child, and Robert Baldwin and Sharon Baldwin, Guardians ad litem for Daniel Craig Baldwin, Appellants, v. PIEDMONT EQUIPMENT COMPANY, a corporation, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

June 2, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wiener, Goldwater & Waldman, Las Vegas, for appellant Eberhard Mfg. Co.

Rose, Edwards, Hunt & Pearson, Las Vegas, for respondents-appellants Baldwins.

Paul C. Parraguirre, Las Vegas, for respondent Piedmont Equip. Co.


OPINION

MANOUKIAN, Justice:

In this appeal, we are required to decide whether in assuming inconsistencies in the jury's verdicts, appellant Eberhard, nevertheless now has standing to challenge the same, and whether the trial court erred in its denial of appellants Baldwins' motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. In affirming, we conclude that irrespective of whether the verdicts were inconsistent, both appellants waived the right to claim verdict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases