PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from the revocation of his probation granted after a prior finding of contempt for wilful non-support. The trial judge made certain findings of fact in revoking probation. As the state here concedes, one of those findings — that defendant had held no job for the past four years — was incorrect. We reverse and remand with instructions to reconsider the decision to revoke probation in light of this corrected view of the facts...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
