1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 515 F.Supp.
  5. 515 F.Supp. 737 (1981)
 

SED, INC. v. CITY OF DAYTON

No. C-3-81-193.

515 F.Supp. 737 (1981)

SED, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF DAYTON, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

June 11, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. McCarty, Fairborn, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

Thomas G. Petkewitz, Dayton, Ohio, for defendant.

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT, SAVE AND EXCEPTING THAT PORTION OF THE MOTION DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFFS' DUE PROCESS ALLEGATIONS WHICH IS SUSTAINED; PLAINTIFFS' MOTION SEEKING LEAVE OF COURT TO AMEND COMPLAINT SUSTAINED; PLAINTIFFS TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS FROM DATE; DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S MOTION SEEKING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; PLAINTIFFS DIRECTED TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases