D LAMBERT RAILING v. SUFFOLK


80 A.D.2d 42 (1981)

D. Lambert Railing Company, Inc., Respondent, v. County of Suffolk, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Royal Guard Fence Co., Inc., Respondent, v. County of Suffolk, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 6, 1981


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Gilmartin, County Attorney (Anton J. Borovina of counsel), for appellant.

Joseph D. Stim, P. C., for D. Lambert Railing Company, Inc., respondent.

Semon & Braverman (Ronald B. Feingold of counsel), for Royal Guard Fence Co., Inc., respondent.

HOPKINS, J. P., DAMIANI, MANGANO and O'CONNOR, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The main issues on this appeal involve the statutory construction of chapters 944 and 945 of the Laws of 1974 and a determination of whether the appellant, County of Suffolk, properly exercised its discretion thereunder.

Respondent subcontractors seek extra compensation authorized by chapters 944 and 945 of the Laws of 1974, which were enacted by the Legislature upon a finding that the energy crisis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases