OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Appellant was convicted of the sale of a controlled substance to a police informant. On appeal, appellant contends 1) that insufficient evidence was adduced against him, and 2) that the district court erred in refusing to grant his motion for a new trial grounded on charges of jury misconduct. We find these contentions to be without merit.
1. "On appeal, the issue is not whether this court would have found appellant guilty, but...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
