1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 276 S.E.2d
  5. 276 S.E.2d 920 (1981)
 

STATE v. LEDNUM

No. 8022SC995.

276 S.E.2d 920 (1981)

STATE of North Carolina v. Lexie LEDNUM

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 7, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. Reginald L. Watkins, Raleigh, for the State.

Barnes, Grimes & Bunce by Jerry B. Grimes and D. Linwood Bunce II, Lexington, for defendant-appellant.

HEDRICK, Judge.

In his first question presented, defendant argues that the trial judge

impermissibly commented on the evidence at trial ... when he continuously refused to sustain the defendant's objection to the State's leading question and in turn sustained practically every objection made by the State for the same type of questions and otherwise made comments evidencing his bias towards the State's case.

Those exceptions discussed under this question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases