MTR MENNA v. NYC SYS.


110 Misc.2d 1065 (1981)

In the Matter of Christopher Menna, Petitioner, v. New York City Employees' Retirement System, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

September 4, 1981


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fink, Weinberg, Fredman, Berman & Lowell, P. C. (William A. Lutt of counsel), for petitioner. Allen G. Schwartz, Corporation Counsel (Stephen P. Kramer and Isaac Klepfish of counsel), for respondent.


NORMAN C. RYP, J.

"Accident" — can its definition be retired and redefined, ex post facto, by an employee's pension system?

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding petitioner moves for an order to review, amend and set aside the respondent's administrative determination dated March 6, 1981, denying an accident disability retirement application filed by petitioner as arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law.

Petitioner states that on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases