LOVE v. BUDAI

No. 79-1551.

653 F.2d 513 (1981)

Frank LOVE, Individually, Pearl Love, Individually, Frank A. Love, a minor, By His Next Friend, Frank Love, Angela D. Love, a minor, By Her Next Friend, Frank Love, Appellants, v. Richard BUDAI, et al.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

March 16, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Judith W. Rogers, Corp. Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on appellee District of Columbia's motion for reconsideration.

Before McGOWAN, Chief Judge, GINSBURG, Circuit Judge, and JOYCE HENS GREEN, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia.


Opinion PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

The District of Columbia has moved that we reconsider our decision to publish the per curiam opinion in the above-captioned case. Local Rule 8(f) provides that unpublished opinions may not be cited in briefs or memoranda as precedents. The District asserts that our decision should not be published and become precedent because "it resolves an important question concerning which there is disagreement in this Circuit, but...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases