1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 406 So.2d
  5. 406 So.2d 723 (1981)
 

PHARIS & PHARIS v. RAYNER

No. 7486.

406 So.2d 723 (1981)

PHARIS & PHARIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary Elizabeth V. RAYNER, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

November 10, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pharis & Pharis, James A. Pharis, Jr. and F. Jean Pharis, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.

Vincent Hazleton, Alexandria, for defendant-appellee.

Before CULPEPPER, CUTRER and LABORDE, JJ.

CUTRER, Judge.

This case has been remanded by the Supreme Court1 after it reversed the ruling of this court which had affirmed the trial court's determination that the attorney's contingent fee contract was void for lack of consent due to an error of fact.2 The Supreme Court held that it was unnecessary to decide whether the contingent fee contract was valid. It concluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases