COM. v. INGE


495 Pa. 624 (1981)

435 A.2d 179

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, v. James INGE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided October 16, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel Harvey Slomsky, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Robert B. Lawler, Chief, Appeals Div., Maureen Brennan, Philadelphia, for appellee.

Before O'BRIEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, KAUFFMAN and WILKINSON, JJ.


OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed.

ROBERTS, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which O'BRIEN, C.J., joined.

ROBERTS, Justice, dissenting.

I dissent from this Court's per curiam affirmance of the order of the PCHA court. On this petition for post-conviction relief, appellant alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective for eliciting on cross-examination of two Commonwealth witnesses that these two witnesses had previously

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases