MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF BRUNE

No. 22746; CA A20342.

634 P.2d 484 (1981)

54 Or.App. 169

In the matter of the Marriage of Audrey W. BRUNE, Now Audrey Smith, Respondent, AND George C. Brune, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 12, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Constance C. Jarvis, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was O. Timothy Moore, Portland.

Lyle W. Banton, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Robert B. Noggle, and Banton & Fulkerson, P.C., Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and WARREN, J.


JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

Husband seeks to terminate his $400 per month spousal support obligation. The trial court refused to modify the decree on the ground that husband failed to show a significant change of circumstances. The issue is whether wife's remarriage and economic arrangements with her present husband constitute a change of circumstances sufficient to justify termination.1 We review de novo. ORS 19.125(3).

The decree...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases