1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 636 P.2d
  5. 636 P.2d 445 (1981)
 

STATE v. MAPEL

No. 80-11 C; CA A20578.

636 P.2d 445 (1981)

54 Or.App. 795

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Michael D. MAPEL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 23, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lauren S. Holland, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were Jagger & Holland, Eugene.

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and THORNTON and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.

THORNTON, Judge.

Defendant was convicted after jury trial of delivering marijuana in violation of ORS 475.992. He appeals assigning the following errors:

1) Denying his motion for mistrial on account of alleged misconduct by three jurors in that they attended a drug education seminar during the trial at which the prosecutor and one state's witness, a deputy sheriff, were lecturers.

2) Denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal based on insufficiency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases