1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 283 S.E.2d
  5. 283 S.E.2d 792 (1981)
 

HOLLAND v. GRYDER

No. 8123DC273.

283 S.E.2d 792 (1981)

Joe HOLLAND v. Matthew D. GRYDER and Drymatic Lumber Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 3, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moore & Willardson by Larry S. Moore, North Wilkesboro, for plaintiff-appellee.

Horton, Horton & Moore by Shelby E. Horton, Asheville, for defendants-appellants.

VAUGHN, Judge.

A ruling on a motion for change of venue is within the sound discretion of the trial judge and is not subject to reversal absent a manifest abuse of discretion. Construction Co. v. McDaniel, 40 N.C. App. 605, 253 S.E.2d 359 (1979). The issue, therefore, is whether defendants have demonstrated such an abuse of discretion. We conclude they have not.

Although defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases