1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 68 Ohio
  5. 68 Ohio St. 2d 38 (1981)
 

STATE EX REL. TONCRAY v. SUMMIT COUNTY BD. OF ELECTIONS

No. 81-1529.

68 Ohio St. 2d 38 (1981)

THE STATE, EX REL. TONCRAY, v. SUMMIT COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 29, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amer, Cunningham & Brennan Co., L.P.A., and Mr. Nickolas P. Andreeff for relator.

Mr. Lynn C. Slaby, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Wayne H. Calabrese, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Relator's complaint does not seek relief which may be granted in an action in prohibition. Prohibition lies to prevent the usurpation of judicial or quasi-judicial power. See State, ex rel. Lehmann, v. Cmich (1970), 23 Ohio St.2d 11. The action of a board of elections in placing issues on the ballot is not an exercise of quasi-judicial power. State, ex rel. Williams, v. Brown

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases