1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 114 Cal.App.3d
  5. 114 Cal.App.3d 939 (1981)
 

CASTANEDA v. HOLCOMB

Docket No. 23219.

114 Cal.App.3d 939 (1981)

170 Cal. Rptr. 875

ROBERT A. CASTANEDA et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. W.R. HOLCOMB, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

January 20, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Taggart & Ziprick and Robert H. Ziprick for Defendant and Appellant.

Ralph H. Prince, City Attorney, and Robert W. Kelly, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

THE COURT.*

This is an appeal from a judgment in a declaratory relief action brought to construe a provision in the Charter of the City of San Bernardino. Defendant W.R. "Bob" Holcomb contends that the court below did not construe the provision correctly.

At issue is section 31 of the charter, which provides: "No order, resolution or ordinance shall have effect without approval of the Mayor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases