STATE v. KELLER

No. C 80-03-30938; CA 18794.

629 P.2d 422 (1981)

52 Or.App. 599

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Richard KELLER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 8, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Groom, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Virginia L. Linder, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were James M. Brown, Atty. Gen., John R. McCulloch, Sol. Gen., and William F. Gary, Deputy Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARDEN and WARREN, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Corpuz, 49 Or.App. 811, 621 P.2d 604 (1980) (holding that the language of ORS 163.175(1)(c) "under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life" is not unconstitutionally vague). Identical language in ORS 163.118(1)(a) is challenged for vagueness by defendant's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases